Blog Layout

Penny Mordaunt helped push gender ideology across our institutions

The subsequent battle for science, sanity, and women's rights has consumed untold resources

By Caroline ffiske 15 July 2022


When she was Minister for Women and Equalities, overseeing the Government Equalities Office during 2018 and 2019, Penny Mordaunt presided over an organisation captured by gender ideology. The output of the GEO under her watch spread gender ideology across public institutions. In doing so it undermined science, free speech, established language, women's rights, and the safeguarding of the vulnerable.  The fightback from grassroots women has since consumed untold energy.


This document illustratres this. Much more work must be done to understand how an unscientific harmful ideology completely took over an institution that was supposed to protect women's rights. Many women seek a Government Enquiry into this matter - perhaps the next Conservative Prime Minister could commit to this.


To get underway, it's worth looking back to 2016 to see that the Government Equality Office was not then completely captured by gender ideology. A 2016 report, commissioned by the GEO continued to recognise a distinction, and a difference in interest, between "LGB" and the "T". Extract below.


This 2016 Report continued to sometimes refer to LGB people 'ungrouped' from trans-identifying individuals, a practice that would cease altogether in later years.

But by July 2018, and with Penny Mordaunt in charge, gender ideology seemed to hold full sway at the GEO. Mordaunt was either entirely complicit - or singularly failed to challenge the normalisation of concepts with no backing in science, emanating from 'queer theory' and social media. This is illustrated by the GEO-commissioned National LGBT Survey.


This 2018 report is significant for its consistent unquestioning normalisation of gender ideology. The concept of 'gender identity' which barely existed a few short years ago is presented in unquestioning fashion. New gender identities such as 'asexual', 'pansexual', 'non-binary' and 'gender-queer' make their appearance in a government report:

Despite the open recognition that the LGBT survey suffered from methodology problems, it was used as the precursor for the launch of an LGBT Action Plan that pushed gender ideology across the state sector.

The GEO report normalised the concept of 'cisgender' thereby also normalising the opposite concept of bodily disassocation. Within the report it is defined as follows: "‘cisgender’ is used throughout the more detailed report as an umbrella term for respondents who identified exclusively as men and women where this was consistent with their sex as assigned at birth". The use here of sex being 'assigned at birth' is an incompetent unscientific neo-concept. It implies that biological sex is not real.  You have to assume that Penny Mordaunt bought into this undermining of elementary science and the promotion of incoherent unscientific ideology.

The following paragraph should surely have given a competent Minister pause. Was the survey hijacked by young people caught up in gender ideology? Should this ideology then have been seemingly so unquestioningly affirmed by a government Ministry and Minister?

Penny Mordaunt nodded through a bar graph about asexuals, pan-sexuals, and non-binary people. I wonder how many of these identifications were fleeting fads for the individuals concerned. It wouldn't matter but for the policy decisions that were to come out of it.

The survey report normalises young lesbian women referring to themselves as heterosexuals. This person had previously talked about their wife. Nowhere does the survey report flag up concerns.

The survey report captures a sad picture of young women 'transitioning' to identity as trans men. Yet this is presented as business as usual, no concerns.

It is what followed this 2018 LGBT survey that changed the direction of British politics. Under Penny Mordaunt, the GEO pushed gender ideology across key institutions. Practically everything that women have since spent untold resources fighting - in order to protect science, free speech, women's rights, and the safeguarding of the vulnerable - can be traced to the LGBT Action Plan that Mordaunt signed off as a follow-up to the 2018 survey.


The July 2018 LGBT Action Plan was signed off with a flourish by Mordaunt:

As with the LGBT Survey, the Action Plan normalised the concept of 'gender identity' as part of government policy and our national conversation. This is despite this having no grounding in science and being a neologism 99% of us had not heard of ten years ago. It's an ideological concept that effectively has the purpose of over-riding the concept of biological sex as a key determinant in how we live and orientate around one another.


The NHS and women's right to single sex accomodation

The first substantive policy commitment in the LGBT Action Plan relates to Health. Mordaunt commits to the engagement of a NHS LGBT Advisor:

By September 2019, women's right to single sex accomodation in NHS hospitals had been over-ridden. An extraordinary NHS document 'Annex B' prioritises the wishes of self-identifying 'trans' individuals in almost all circumstances.

The following paragraph about non-binary people exemplifies the utterly cavalier approach to respecting existing legislation and norms; and women's rights, privacy and dignity. There is no mechanism for a person to be identified as 'non-binary' apart from simple self-declaration.  So here we have the mechanism whereby the NHS waved through any man being able to self-identify into women's spaces. There is no record of there having been a consultation - were any women's groups consulted? What about the application of the Equality Act? How and why were the potential concerns of women so ignored?

Women have been fighting ever since to have their voices heard on this matter and to have Annex B reviewed. To date, no movement. Sajid Javid expressed concerns but they didn't go anywhere.


The exponential increase in the number of girls self-identifying as men

The LGBT Action Plan raises this issue in a rather cavalier fashion. In fact it refers to young women as 'people assigned female at birth'.  Here is a thing: I searched for the word 'women' in the LGBT Action Plan. Apart from its use for offices and titles it is only used to refer to men. How did the term 'people assigned female at birth' make it into a government document?


This commitment to gather evidence about so many young women identifying as trans made it into a Times article in September 2018. Even in the GEO statement in the Times article, the scale of ideological capture is evident: "Last night a source at the Government Equalities Office said: “There has been a substantial increase in the number of individuals assigned female at birth being referred to the NHS." Had the GEO already banned the word 'woman'? After that nothing happened - there was no enquiry. By February 2020 the GEO were even refusing to say what was or was not happening, turning down an FOI request that I made. I'm not sure how Mordaunt can now claim this ongoing non-event as evidence of her concern.


Education

Up and down the country, children are being introduced to the idea that they might have been born in the wrong body, or that they have a gender identity they might want to prioritise over their sex. To find this gender identity they should refer to vacuous gender stereotypes. Unsurprisingly, the number of young people claiming a neo- gender identity continues to rise. This trend was fast-tracked by Mordaunt's LGBT Action Plan.


First was the commitment of substantial taxpayer funds to organisations who used it to promote gender ideology to school children:

Most of the documents that were produced as a result of this funding were so bad that the PSHE who initially hosted them, removed them from view. Here is some of the material that was produced, illustrated in an article I wrote at the time:

One particular outfit, Equaliteach, wrote something so bad (using taxpayer funds) that the next Minister for Women and Equalities, Liz Truss, publicly disowned it. Neverthless, it's still available free to schools to download. Details here - and note that only last year, the Government was still giving this outfit money.


Back to the LGBT Action Plan: yes it also covered the new "Relationship and Sex Education" Guidance for schools.

When this came out, it required schools to teach school children about 'gender identity' just as if this had always been a thing. See page 26:

Parents have been fighting the indoctrination of their children with gender ideology by some schools ever since.


The LGBT Action Plan signed up the Crown Prosecution Service to write a Hate Crimes School Pack.

The resulting document was so bad it had to be withdrawn. I wrote about it here:

Safe Schools Alliance mounted a Judicial Review to get this CPS document withdrawn. They were successful. That's how bad our public institutions got for a while - they produced documents completely captured by incoherent ideology; quite often they misrepresented the law.


The Conversion Therapy Ban which risks criminalising responsible therapists for challenging the gender identification of vulnerable young people? It originated here too.

Women accused of hate crime for refering to biological reality?

Violent male prisoners in women's prisons?

Reform of the Gender Recognition Act? The document commited to making it less bureaucratic and instrusive. (p22)


Statistics? "The Government Equalities Office, the Office for National Statistics and the Government Statistical Service will work together on a cross-government project to develop monitoring standards for sexual orientation and gender identity across central government." Was it this engagement that led the ONS to commit to allowing people to self-identify their sex in the Census? Once again, a decision only reversed via a legal challenge from FairPlayforWomen.


Sports?  "Following Sport England’s investment in a study by Pride Sports to identify how to better support LGBT inclusion in sport, Sport England will consider the recommendations of the research." - The start of an increasing presence of trans-identifying men in women's sports?


Privileged access to decision-making? "To help us guide and deliver this plan, we will establish a new LGBT Advisory Panel for government. The Minister for Women and Equalities will appoint the membership for the group and it will comprise representatives from civil society. The panel will advise on LGBT issues that we have an interest in." Here they are getting updates on GRA Reform - and the development of the Census. Were there any women groups getting similar updates? (No).


***

All the things women have been fighting ever since seem to have originated or been reinforced in this 2018 LGBT Action Plan signed off by Penny Mordaunt. The presence of violent males in women's prisons, trans-identify males winning trophies in women's sports, the promotion of gender ideology in schools, men who identify as 'non-binary' being allowed into women's hospital wards, the undermining of science via 'sex assigned at birth', the threats to free speech from the definitions of 'hate crime' and 'hate incidents',  the slow erosion of women's language via 'individuals assigned female at birth'.


Why did Mordaunt sign it all off? No concerns for science, free speech, women's rights, children's safeguarding? Shouldn't the very first mention of 'people assigned female at birth' have resulted in a major red flag? This is not science - it's ideology. How could a government minister be so easily captured by it all; participate in promoting it? More work is needed to understand this era in our history. What lessons can we learn?


The next Prime Minister must launch a public enquiry so we can document and learn from the unedifying capture of our public institutions by an incoherent ideology that does great harm.

by Caroline Ffiske 10 Oct, 2024
Will a gender critical barrister feel free to express her views in the workplace? Those of her client in court?
15 Jul, 2024
Almost a year ago I made the difficult decision to retire after the next general election. That election came a little earlier than expected but I made a promise to my family, so I am standing down from both Conservatives for Women and my parliamentary work. I know I am leaving our task in excellent hands; my fellow directors at Conservatives for Women will continue to ensure we solidify the gains we have made within our party, and my dear friends and colleagues in many other groups will hold the new government's feet to the fire. Some of those groups did not even exist three years ago; our movement to restore sanity, safeguarding, and protect our sex-based rights goes from strength to strength. I will be working in parliament until the end of July. I will continue to support our fight in any way I can, and will always be available if I can be of help. I am stepping back, but not completely stepping away. It has been an absolute honour to share this battle with you all. For the foreseeable future though, you will find me listening to Test Match Special in my shed :-) Karen Varley, 15 July 2024
15 Jul, 2024
Five years ago Conservatives for Women was born. We were a group of women shocked by how a marginal, unscientific, and harmful idea was taking centre stage in our shared public life. We knew, like everyone else, that a vanishingly small number of men and women seek to present as the opposite sex in their public and private lives and deserve to be treated civilly. But we did not believe that school children should be taught that ‘everyone has a gender identity’. We knew this involved the State lying to our children. We did not believe that vulnerable children should be supported by the NHS to take experimental drug treatments to suppress their puberty and then move on to cross sex hormones. We instinctively knew this was the State harming our children. We also knew that women had a right to single sex spaces, services, sports, and wider opportunities. And we knew that we had a right to talk about this; yet doing so, five years ago, appeared genuinely frightening. Women were losing their jobs. So a small bunch of Conservative women got together. For several years we worked incredibly closely even though we had never met! Because our goal was clear. We knew that what was going on had to be addressed at a policy level; at a parliamentary level. We needed the Conservative Party to become gender critical. While we worked cooperatively, Karen Varley became our group leader. I expect she had little idea, five years ago, that she would soon be working 70 hour weeks, engaging directly with Ministers, MPs and Peers, tackling serious policy issues in real time. Conservatives for Women, working alongside all the other gender critical groups and grassroots individuals, turned the tide on gender ideology in the UK. Together we created Terf Island. We know that our work is very far from over. But now Karen is retiring and we would like to thank her for a truly immense contribution. She’s played her part in a historic movement. We look forward to someone, someday, writing up this period in full. They will need to talk to Karen. And now our work will continue. Here’s to Karen Varley, grassroots women, and Terf Island! Caroline ffiske, 15 July 2024
12 Jun, 2024
We hope this newsletter finds you well and gearing up for an election battle that’s only just begun, and with the reminder that, however dire the polls, Teresa May had a 20 point lead over Jeremy Corbyn in 2017… and then she published the Conservative manifesto and enraged the public. Her lead plummeted and the Conservative’s majority shrank enough that she had to make a deal with the DUP to command a majority to govern. Labour should be publishing its manifesto tomorrow and there is every chance it contains something that will enrage the public at large. Even if that doesn’t transpire, there is still everything to play for, and to that end, our candidates need your help. We already know the Conservatives have pledged in its manifesto to make the Equality Act clear , to clarify that sex means, and has always meant, biological sex, and not something that can be modified by a piece of paper. This, along with other manifesto commitments, is a measure that will do a great deal to help preserve single sex spaces, and protect the safety and dignity of women and girls. We now need to get out there and make it clear that our candidates not only know what a woman actually is, but will always put the safety, privacy and dignity of women and girls first. If you haven’t read it, the full manifesto can be found here . We highlighted some of the key statements in our X thread here . One of the first candidates to give a clear and well informed response to questions on women’s rights and child safeguarding was Michael Tomlinson , Conservative candidate for Mid Dorset and North Poole. Let us know if your candidate says something useful! Below, we have listed every Conservative candidate who is known to be supportive of our aims. Every one of these candidates needs support, whether it’s through encouraging messages via social media or by offering assistance with canvasing – any and all help, however seemingly small, is desperately needed. This is by no means an exhaustive list, and we are sure there may be more but we wanted to get this out to you quickly. If you see them around and you intend to vote for them, tell them WHY they have your vote. If the opposition asks why you won’t vote for them, tell them too! Women's rights and child safeguarding matter. If you would like to get directly involved with any of the campaigns for the PPCs listed, you should find contact details on their websites; if nobody gets back to you quickly then let us know via a DM on X or email us at info@conservativesforwomen.org as we have direct contact with many of the campaign coordinators. If none of these MPs are local to you, there are still things you can do that help: follow them and like their pages/posts on social media for example. Many have a presence on X, Facebook, and Instagram. You could consider doing some telephone canvassing - just half an hour a day could make a difference to any one of them. Contact them directly - or volunteer via the Conservatives website. Or do call one of our directors Caroline Ffiske on 07712 675 305 if you have not done this before and would like a few tips! Let’s give this one last push before we all mark our Xs on the ballot papers. First of all, the women:
29 Sept, 2023
'Don’t turn your back on women and girls'
by Caroline ffiske 23 Aug, 2023
Conservative MPs and councillors need to pay much closer attention
22 Jul, 2023
Stonewall Chair Comes Unstuck on 'Trans' Issues
by Jeannette Towey 08 Apr, 2023
I am left wondering...
by Caroline ffiske 01 Feb, 2023
Then balance gender ideology alongside other beliefs, including opposition to it.
Show More
Share by: