Blog Layout

We have complained about the BBC's coverage of the Conversion Therapy Debate

This irresponsible bias from the BBC must stop - please complain

Picture of trans rights protestors

Caroline ffiske was a Conservative Councillor for Eight Years. Published on 11 March 2021.


We have written to the BBC, and to the responsible Secretary of State, Oliver Dowden, to complain about the BBC's coverage of the Conversion Therapy debate. The one-sideness; the unwillingness to give any coverage, or credence, to those calling for caution; is deeply irresponsible, divisive, and biased. We urge others to complain as well. This issue impacts lives.


**********


Dear BBC Complaints and Secretary of State, Oliver Dowden,


We write to you to complain about the BBC's coverage of the debate around Conversion Therapy, following the recent Westminster Hall debate on this subject. In particular, we would like to point you to this piece which the BBC published today (Thursday 11 March).


The article makes clear that 'LGBT+' groups now use a definition of 'Conversion Therapy' that covers both sexual orientation and 'gender identity'. 

"Conversion therapy" refers to any form of treatment or psychotherapy which aims to change a person's sexual orientation or gender identity.

It then proceeds with ample coverage of activists who seek to not just (quite legitimately) campaign against, but also to openly attack, the Government's cautious approach to this issue. Voice and coverage is given to '20 LGBT+ organisations', MPs who 'backed a ban', the petition signed by '250,000 people', Jayne Ozanne and James Morton (formerly of the government's LGBT+ Advisory Panel), Peter Tatchell, Stonewall, and Labour shadow equality minister, Marsha de Cordova. 


Here is one example of the BBC's inept and credulous reporting. "Ms Ozanne said there had been "a lack of engagement" with the group she runs, the Ozanne Foundation, and she accused ministers of acting against their advice." The implication seems to be that the Government should simply follow the directives of certain organisations (LGBT+ groups) and ignore everyone else. This is a shallow tactic coming from such a group; but for the BBC to credulously report, without challenge or alternative voice, is extraordinarily poor journalism and openly biased.


Where, in this article, is the BBC coverage of the voices, the campaign groups, who are deeply concerned about the way in which the concept of conversion therapy has been stretched to cover not just sexual orientation, but gender identity? Such a stretch raises the possibility that when a young person develops gender dysphoria, discomfort with their sexed body, a belief that they were 'born in the wrong body', then the only path ahead for them, from responsible adults, and all of society, will be affirmation. 


Have BBC journalists stopped to consider where 100% affirmation leads? Have they not looked at any of the readily-available research that shows that the vast majority of young people who engage with 'gender ideology' desist with the right support? Should this support; the deep talking, exploration, engagement they need; from highly experienced professionals, be banned? Do BBC journalists really think that such young people would be better off if, to a person, they proceed down an affirmation pathway that can lead to puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, facial surgery, breasts cut off, penises surgically removed, 'holes' created that need to be dilated daily for life, loss of sexual pleasures, sterility? Is this a better future for our young people? Why? 


The Government is surely right to tread with care. The voices of caution in the gender ideology debate are now everywhere; group after group has formed. They are highly successful, with active and growing membership. They are engaged in policy, interacting with members of parliament and the House of Lords, challenging gender ideology in court. They represent the interests of many people up and down the country concerned by gender ideology. Yet the BBC, despite its charter, seems unwilling to make contact, to explore both sides of an argument, to desist from bias, when it comes to gender ideology. Could the BBC please do better? Try to reflect its charter? 


We would be pleased to meet to discuss, bringing representatives from these many groups.


Conservatives for Women.


**********

by Caroline Ffiske 10 Oct, 2024
Will a gender critical barrister feel free to express her views in the workplace? Those of her client in court?
15 Jul, 2024
Almost a year ago I made the difficult decision to retire after the next general election. That election came a little earlier than expected but I made a promise to my family, so I am standing down from both Conservatives for Women and my parliamentary work. I know I am leaving our task in excellent hands; my fellow directors at Conservatives for Women will continue to ensure we solidify the gains we have made within our party, and my dear friends and colleagues in many other groups will hold the new government's feet to the fire. Some of those groups did not even exist three years ago; our movement to restore sanity, safeguarding, and protect our sex-based rights goes from strength to strength. I will be working in parliament until the end of July. I will continue to support our fight in any way I can, and will always be available if I can be of help. I am stepping back, but not completely stepping away. It has been an absolute honour to share this battle with you all. For the foreseeable future though, you will find me listening to Test Match Special in my shed :-) Karen Varley, 15 July 2024
15 Jul, 2024
Five years ago Conservatives for Women was born. We were a group of women shocked by how a marginal, unscientific, and harmful idea was taking centre stage in our shared public life. We knew, like everyone else, that a vanishingly small number of men and women seek to present as the opposite sex in their public and private lives and deserve to be treated civilly. But we did not believe that school children should be taught that ‘everyone has a gender identity’. We knew this involved the State lying to our children. We did not believe that vulnerable children should be supported by the NHS to take experimental drug treatments to suppress their puberty and then move on to cross sex hormones. We instinctively knew this was the State harming our children. We also knew that women had a right to single sex spaces, services, sports, and wider opportunities. And we knew that we had a right to talk about this; yet doing so, five years ago, appeared genuinely frightening. Women were losing their jobs. So a small bunch of Conservative women got together. For several years we worked incredibly closely even though we had never met! Because our goal was clear. We knew that what was going on had to be addressed at a policy level; at a parliamentary level. We needed the Conservative Party to become gender critical. While we worked cooperatively, Karen Varley became our group leader. I expect she had little idea, five years ago, that she would soon be working 70 hour weeks, engaging directly with Ministers, MPs and Peers, tackling serious policy issues in real time. Conservatives for Women, working alongside all the other gender critical groups and grassroots individuals, turned the tide on gender ideology in the UK. Together we created Terf Island. We know that our work is very far from over. But now Karen is retiring and we would like to thank her for a truly immense contribution. She’s played her part in a historic movement. We look forward to someone, someday, writing up this period in full. They will need to talk to Karen. And now our work will continue. Here’s to Karen Varley, grassroots women, and Terf Island! Caroline ffiske, 15 July 2024
12 Jun, 2024
We hope this newsletter finds you well and gearing up for an election battle that’s only just begun, and with the reminder that, however dire the polls, Teresa May had a 20 point lead over Jeremy Corbyn in 2017… and then she published the Conservative manifesto and enraged the public. Her lead plummeted and the Conservative’s majority shrank enough that she had to make a deal with the DUP to command a majority to govern. Labour should be publishing its manifesto tomorrow and there is every chance it contains something that will enrage the public at large. Even if that doesn’t transpire, there is still everything to play for, and to that end, our candidates need your help. We already know the Conservatives have pledged in its manifesto to make the Equality Act clear , to clarify that sex means, and has always meant, biological sex, and not something that can be modified by a piece of paper. This, along with other manifesto commitments, is a measure that will do a great deal to help preserve single sex spaces, and protect the safety and dignity of women and girls. We now need to get out there and make it clear that our candidates not only know what a woman actually is, but will always put the safety, privacy and dignity of women and girls first. If you haven’t read it, the full manifesto can be found here . We highlighted some of the key statements in our X thread here . One of the first candidates to give a clear and well informed response to questions on women’s rights and child safeguarding was Michael Tomlinson , Conservative candidate for Mid Dorset and North Poole. Let us know if your candidate says something useful! Below, we have listed every Conservative candidate who is known to be supportive of our aims. Every one of these candidates needs support, whether it’s through encouraging messages via social media or by offering assistance with canvasing – any and all help, however seemingly small, is desperately needed. This is by no means an exhaustive list, and we are sure there may be more but we wanted to get this out to you quickly. If you see them around and you intend to vote for them, tell them WHY they have your vote. If the opposition asks why you won’t vote for them, tell them too! Women's rights and child safeguarding matter. If you would like to get directly involved with any of the campaigns for the PPCs listed, you should find contact details on their websites; if nobody gets back to you quickly then let us know via a DM on X or email us at info@conservativesforwomen.org as we have direct contact with many of the campaign coordinators. If none of these MPs are local to you, there are still things you can do that help: follow them and like their pages/posts on social media for example. Many have a presence on X, Facebook, and Instagram. You could consider doing some telephone canvassing - just half an hour a day could make a difference to any one of them. Contact them directly - or volunteer via the Conservatives website. Or do call one of our directors Caroline Ffiske on 07712 675 305 if you have not done this before and would like a few tips! Let’s give this one last push before we all mark our Xs on the ballot papers. First of all, the women:
29 Sept, 2023
'Don’t turn your back on women and girls'
by Caroline ffiske 23 Aug, 2023
Conservative MPs and councillors need to pay much closer attention
22 Jul, 2023
Stonewall Chair Comes Unstuck on 'Trans' Issues
by Jeannette Towey 08 Apr, 2023
I am left wondering...
by Caroline ffiske 01 Feb, 2023
Then balance gender ideology alongside other beliefs, including opposition to it.
Show More
Share by: